Hello Anonymous,
What a great question and thread to discuss the inner workings of being a CLASS observer.
As a CLASS trainer, I once had a teacher come up to me during a training break and told me she was worried that she was being too loud. She asked if I would give her lower scores because she was loud. My answer was, as always, that it depends. Did the children think she was too loud by shying away from her or showing her that they did not want to interact? Her answer was, "No, they sit on my lap and we are very close with great relationships." I shared that it isn't up to me to decide what is right for her children in her classroom and culture, but that the children define success by their response to her. If her interactions engage children, however loud, and they respond to her, then I give "credit" to the interactions wherever they fit in the CLASS dimensions.
She was relieved, but shared that she was working on her loudness.
The moral of the story is that in order to score the CLASS we need to see teacher's affect on the children, and score evidence or lack of evidence for each indicator and average them for the dimension score. Our own cultural lens needs to be put aside as much as possible and our "CLASSES" put on over our eyes and ears.
Your examples in the dimension of language modeling were that she repeated and extended and had advanced language words, giving evidence there, but that she dominated the discussion which may have lowered the score in the indicator of frequent conversation if the children were not encouraged to talk. From what you describe, there was a mix of effective interactions in Language Modeling.
It would be difficult to be high scoring in Instructional Support, Concept Development and Quality of Feedback as you described it. In order to achieve at a high scoring level, the children would need to have "stretched the muscles of their brains" (Bob Pianta) and had a deeper understanding as a result. A teacher that dominates can have problems, as you said, "she was fast paced and did not give children time to think and respond". You would need to see evidence of the children's responses both verbal and nonverbal for their level of engagement.
It would be interesting to note if in all 4 cycles she was this boisterous.
Again, great topic, thank you for posting!
------------------------------
Curry Ander
Teachstone CLASS Consultant/Trainer
curry.ander@teachstone.com------------------------------