All Things CLASS

 View Only
  • 1.  Misogyny and the word no

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 09-15-2024 14:05
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    I would love for the Teachstone community to address the hidden misogyny that underlies the negative climate section of CLASS. I'm concerned that we are modeling anger and irritation for our next generation of women and men.  We, as mostly females teachers, are instructed to rarely if ever use the word no when talking to students.  I wonder what the long term implications of this are for our children.  Boys need to be taught that no means noe PARTICULARy when a girl or woman says it.  If women in authority positions are trained to never say no, how will our next generation of men learn to hear no from a woman. What example are we also setting for the girls in our class, when the women they look up to are hiding small signals of irritation and glossing their feelings over.  
    to be clear, I'm not saying we have the right to direct anger toward young children as women, I am saying this facet of CLASS seems to give teachers little way to express their feelings and in fact upholds a fear of women's anger that is an undercurrent in our society anyway.  Shouldn't we be judged on HOW  we model our own anger or irritation rather than the suppression of our feelings? Wouldn't modeling healthy ways of deal with feelings be the correct way to manage this, rather then the current way of negatively scoring women's irritation and negative feelings.
    Can't we do better than this poor model of mental health?  



  • 2.  RE: Misogyny and the word no

    Posted 09-17-2024 11:46

    Hi there! Thank you for sharing your thoughtful concerns about the CLASS framework, particularly regarding the Negative Climate section. 

    Our goal at Teachstone is to help educators create positive and effective classroom interactions. The CLASS tool aims to promote positive interactions by encouraging teachers to manage their emotions in a way that supports a nurturing learning environment. However, it's not our intention to suggest that teachers should suppress their feelings or avoid setting boundaries. Instead, we advocate for modeling healthy ways to express and manage emotions, including anger and irritation. It's essential for children to learn how to deal with their feelings constructively, and seeing their teachers do this can be a powerful lesson.

    We encourage open discussions in our community about these important topics and welcome any further insights you may have. 



    ------------------------------
    Liz Savage
    Sr Program Manager
    Teachstone
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Misogyny and the word no

    Posted 09-17-2024 11:49

    If anyone else struggles with this, I also wanted to share these strategies you  can use to express frustration constructively and to say "no" appropriately when working with young children:

    1. Acknowledge Feelings: When you or a child feels frustrated, acknowledge the emotion without judgment. For example, "I see you're feeling really upset right now." This helps validate their feelings and opens the door for constructive communication.

    2. Calm Yourself First: Before addressing any behavior, take a moment to calm yourself. Deep breathing, visualizing a peaceful scene, or walking away if safe to do so can help. Approaching the situation calmly sets a positive example for children.

    3. Set Clear Boundaries: It's important to set and maintain clear boundaries in a calm and consistent manner. For example, you can say, "It's okay to feel upset, but it's not okay to hit. We use gentle hands."

    4. Modeling Calm Responses: Instead of suppressing your feelings, model how to handle them appropriately. If you're frustrated, you might say, "I'm feeling frustrated because there's a lot of noise. Let's all take a deep breath together to calm down.

    5. Offer Alternatives: When saying no, provide alternatives to guide the child towards acceptable behavior. For example, "You can't throw the blocks, but you can build a tower with them."

    6. Follow Up with Guidance: After a situation has calmed down, discuss what happened and what can be done differently next time. For instance, "Earlier, you were really mad when someone took your toy. It's okay to be mad, but next time, let's use our words to ask for it back."

    By using these strategies, you can help children understand and manage their emotions while maintaining a positive and respectful classroom environment. Modeling healthy ways to deal with feelings teaches children valuable skills they will carry with them throughout their lives.



    ------------------------------
    Liz Savage
    Sr Program Manager
    Teachstone
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Misogyny and the word no

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 09-18-2024 06:42
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    If those are your goals, why are they not scored that way in the CLASS manual. You reverse score this rather than scoring the above.  I take issue with that. In education, we are to,d to highlight the behaviors we want to see, yet in this CLASS domain, you reverse score it, and are looking for negativity rather than scoring for the teacher regulating their emotions and kids emotions.  There is absolutely misogyny and the suppression of emotions written into  this. I




  • 5.  RE: Misogyny and the word no

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 09-18-2024 06:53
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    I'll add that workshops are being geared around your tool, state systems are incorporating your tools. But in this area, your scoring system does not reflect what you want to see. You are scoring backwards.  That very nice list above should be incorporated into scoring.  We are all having dysregualted children (autims/adhd rates are only going up in children) in our classroom. Being a framework for HOW to deal with this children rather than a framework for what not to do would benefit all. You are trying to change the teacher world, follow what you say and make a framework for a positive classroom in all of your dimensions. Frankly, it is hypocritical if you not to.




  • 6.  RE: Misogyny and the word no

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous
    Posted 09-18-2024 07:08
    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous

    Apparently, I have even more to say. ;)

    Right now, the way this is written comes from a place where the teacher is charged with maintaining order without getting angry. That is the thrust of the domain negatIve climate. Teachers believe they "need to control" outbursts etc.  In reality, we are in charge of helping children regulate, and if you rewrote this to reflect the great principals above, teachers would understand that their role is to help children feel their feelings, rather than having a teacher being judged on how few behavior incidents we face in the classroom. This is what you actually want treachery to do, and it should be reflected in your scoring system. 




  • 7.  RE: Misogyny and the word no

    Posted 09-20-2024 16:56

    Thank you for sharing your concerns. We agree that educators should model healthy emotional responses, that children need to learn that boundaries are non-negotiable, and that "no" is a word to be respected.

    To clarify, CLASS does not restrict teachers from using "no" or from expressing their emotions. Instead, CLASS focuses on how we express emotions in ways that help children develop emotional well-being. The Negative Climate dimension is designed to capture interactions where hostility or irritability may make children feel unsafe – not to stop teachers from being authentic, but to encourage learning settings in which everyone feels respected and supported. For example, a harsh "NO!" can reinforce hostility and emotional dysregulation, whereas a calm "No, you can't climb on the table," would not impact the negative climate rating. It's not just about the word itself, but also about how emotions are conveyed (e.g., tone, body language, context) to maintain a supportive, safe environment.

    Following up with a positively stated behavior expectation, such as "sit on the chair," is particularly effective because it provides a clear, actionable instruction about what the child should be doing. This not only reduces confusion but also encourages children to focus on the desired behavior, rather than simply being told what not to do. This clear behavior expectation would be captured by the Behavior Management dimension.

    We also agree that how we model emotions and boundaries matters for children. It's valuable for children to witness healthy expressions of emotions and effective regulation practices. For example, an educator might say "I am feeling frustrated because it's clean up time and I am the only one picking up blocks. I am going to take two deep breaths… Okay – let's work together to tidy the block area." This effective expression of frustration and effective modeling of emotion regulation would also be captured by the Behavior Management dimension. CLASS doesn't discourage these emotions – instead, educators are encouraged to express them in ways that contribute to children's emotional well-being. 

    It's important to remember that the CLASS dimensions should not be viewed in isolation – they function together as a part of a comprehensive measure of effective interactions. The strategies Liz mentioned above are captured by other dimensions. For example, acknowledging feelings & following up with guidance are captured in the Teacher/Educator Sensitivity dimension, while strategies like calming yourself first, setting clear boundaries, and offering alternatives are captured by the Behavior Management dimension.

    We appreciate the time you took to provide feedback and we welcome ongoing discussions to ensure CLASS aligns with best practices in mental health, emotion regulation, and gender equity. Thank you again for raising these important issues-hearing from folks in the field help us improve how we support healthy and effective educator-child interactions. If you'd like to connect, send me an email veronica.fernandez@teachstone.com and we can set up a call. 



    ------------------------------
    Veronica Fernandez
    ------------------------------