All Things CLASS

 View Only
  • 1.  Multi Lingual Learners Early 3 year old classrooms

    Posted 01-18-2023 08:28
    First I want to say that I absolutely love the Classroom Assessment Scoring System and how it increases the quality of interactions within the classroom environment .  
    Recently, our 3 yr old class was observed and prior to the observation I pondered my thoughts regarding how many children did not speak yet.  Most of our 3 year old children are young 3's and speak several languages at home.  Having such diversity has been a highlight of my administrating experience. Perhaps there may be additional assessment behavioral markers for DLL and MLL classrooms that I am not aware of.  While the teacher made many attempts at conversing with the children, the  responses were limited and fragmented.  These fragmented conversations will directly impact the scoring on QF, and Feedback Loops.  Hence, Instructional Support numbers will be lower.
    Has anyone had an experience where CD, QF, and LM scores were in the high range even though the children were not able to express themselves in English very well?  I would be curious to hear other experiences regarding MLL learners and the CLASS assessment experience.
    Thank you in advance for your responses.

    ------------------------------
    PaulaGiglio
    East NorthportNY
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Multi Lingual Learners Early 3 year old classrooms

    Posted 01-25-2023 23:36
    I'm having a problem passing the toddler observer exam because of this very thing. I don't think it's fair to score a teacher who is trying to communicate with students who are in a multi-lingual classroom lower. This extends to ALL aspects of the program with the book not addressing positive climate, teacher sensitivity, rfcp, bg, fld, qf, and lm. The book only addresses lm with the footnote stating "...in bilingual classes, the use of 2 languages does not increase lm rating. There must be a back and forth exchange w/ children repeating and extending language and SO FORTH, regardless of language used."

    But there's a much deeper issue than classrooms where the students are trying to learn English while speaking their mother tongue. As much as I love the program and how it helps teachers become better at their profession, the "Master Observers" (whoever they are!), need to re-think observation rating scores in general. I have a TON of questions that the CLASS instructor couldn't answer including: (1) the program's research data results, (2) where the information for the curriculum was obtained (because most of the information for the toddler physical/motor development is wrong. I'm an expert in my field with 2 masters and a PhD in neuropsychology/kinesiology and curriculum and instruction from Columbia University. I've been teaching all levels for over 30 years, presented over 200 international/national/state presentations/keynotes, won a ton of awards, published books, chapters in books, research articles in peer reviewed journals, as well as an observer for a number of companies including EdTpa, CDA, CAEP, etc.), (3) the errors within the curriculums (information, missing links, missing slides, inconsistencies between the manual, participant guide, website, and more), and more, but I want to try to remain positive.

    All I can say, is I've talked to others who feel the same frustration, especially over how observers are guessing at the rating scores, because the Master scorers are not consistent with their own scores between videos and are vague with feedback given at the end of tests (Don't give any feedback at all if all you're providing is "You scored 2 of 5 higher than the master observer scores". Which 3 did I get wrong? Why did I get it wrong? By how much did I get it wrong by? This is AWFUL feedback by YOUR OWN STANDARDS!

    Please help!!



    Stay Safe,
    Dr. Joanne Hunter
     
    Ed.M.; M.S.; ORD.M.; C.A.P.E.





  • 3.  RE: Multi Lingual Learners Early 3 year old classrooms

    Posted 01-26-2023 17:48
    Hi @Paula Giglio and @dr. joanne hunter,

    Thank you both for your messages! I am checking in with our CLASS experts to ensure you get all of the help you need. My apologies for the delay!

    Best,
    Allison​​

    ------------------------------
    Allison Bloomfield
    Silver Spring MD
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Multi Lingual Learners Early 3 year old classrooms

    Posted 01-27-2023 11:56
    Thank you. I really appreciate it

    ------------------------------
    dr. joannehunter
    AlexandriaVA
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Multi Lingual Learners Early 3 year old classrooms

    Posted 01-27-2023 13:42
    Yes this would be fantastic. 
    Please get back to us.
    Thank you very much 





  • 6.  RE: Multi Lingual Learners Early 3 year old classrooms

    Posted 01-26-2023 20:07
    I have not gotten evaluated personally on the class but from what it seems we will be evaluated on February 8, 2023. I imagine it must be hard because if they are trying to manage one language, it must be hard, let alone three.

    ------------------------------
    GeraldineFernandez
    ------------------------------



  • 7.  RE: Multi Lingual Learners Early 3 year old classrooms

    Posted 01-31-2023 18:15

    Hi @Paula Giglio, @dr. joanne hunter, and @Geraldine Fernandez,


    Thank you all again for your messages! After speaking with some of our CLASS experts, here is some information I've gathered.


    CLASS Second Edition

    We recognized CLASS 2008 did not capture all diverse learning environments, including those you've mentioned with multilingual students. This was a massive driver to create CLASS Second Edition, as we wanted the tool to be more inclusive. Teachstone is confident that observers who have transitioned to Second Edition will be able to measure the interactions in the classroom with greater consideration for equity. We also offer additional CLASS Observation Support you might be interested in! If you have any questions about CLASS Second Edition, please let us know! 


    Test feedback

    The feedback we can give after you've completed your reliability test is general on purpose. It is meant to guide you in your studies before completing your next reliability attempt rather than to be used like the feedback you receive for the practice videos. Part of this is to minimize the recording of scores for each video. If we provided the scores and justification for each, we would not be able to utilize those videos for future testing. Teachstone offers no-cost, individualized reliability support to anyone who has not successfully passed their first two attempts. If you'd like more specific feedback based on your score report, talking to one of our CLASS experts is a great way to get detailed information before attempting to achieve reliability again. Please note that Teachstone's reliability support team can only provide help if you are in between testing attempts, not if you have begun a new attempt.


    Master Coding and CLASS Research

    For each video, a group of master coders score the video individually and then meet to create a consensus code. Therefore, there isn't one person I can refer you to, but if you have any questions about the scores for a video, I can always share this feedback!

    The research for the CLASS tool has been conducted over the years, mainly by researchers at the University of Virginia. The CLASS Research is briefly mentioned during training,and there is additional information in your CLASS manual. If you're interested in more in-depth information, you can always email us, and we can connect you with someone who can share more specifics. 


    I hope this response is helpful. Please let me know if you have any additional questions!


    Best,
    Allison

    ​​​

    ------------------------------
    Allison Bloomfield
    Silver Spring MD
    ------------------------------