In observation and ratings, duration is crucial alongside depth and frequency of interactions. Key points include:
- Frequency, Depth, and Duration: While evaluating observations, it is essential to document how many times interactions occur (frequency), how intense and authentic they are (depth), and how long they last in proportion to the entire observation period (duration) .
- Weighing Duration in Scores: When scoring, consider the impact of high-quality interactions. If a few high-quality interactions occur but are outnumbered by less effective ones, this should reflect in the score.
- Assessing Brief but Effective Interactions: Sometimes brief interactions can be very effective, such as a quick but meaningful connection between teacher and student. However, if most interactions are brief and not sustained, this might lower the overall score.
- Avoiding Over-Emphasis on Single Incidents: Single interactions shouldn't unduly influence the score. Consider the overall quality of interactions throughout the observation.
- Consistency Across Cycles: Evaluate each observation cycle independently, reflecting the consistency and characteristics of interactions. Predominantly less effective interactions should lead to a lower score.
If one-third of the observation features good interactions but the remaining two-thirds are less effective, the overall score should reflect this balance, acknowledging the good interactions but also the predominance of less effective ones.